Higher Education
Related Insights
06.09.2026
Blogs
Federal Court Vacates $100,000 H-1B Fee; Implications for Higher Education Remain Uncertain
On June 8, 2026, a federal district court in Massachusetts issued an opinion and order vacating U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) policies implementing President Donald Trump’s September 19, 2025 Presidential Proclamation. The Proclamation required payment of a $100,000 fee for certain H-1B visa applications (See New H-1B Application Fee Requirement Announced). USCIS subsequently issued policies describing when the fee would apply and how it would be collected.
05.12.2026
Blogs
What Can Single-Sex Institutions Do in Light of DOE’s Title IX Attack on Transgender Admissions at Smith College?
In June 2025, a group calling itself “Defend Education” filed a complaint against Smith College for discrimination on the basis of sex-based discrimination based on its admission of transgender women. Smith has admitted transgender women since 2015 and currently considers “any applicants who self-identify as women.” On May 4, 2026, the Department of Education opened a Title IX investigation.
04.30.2026
Blogs
Executive Order on Collegiate Athletics: A Reset or a Rewind?
On Friday, April 3, 2026, the President signed an executive order on collegiate athletics in an effort to restore a regulatory posture that resembles, in essence, a pre–name, image, and likeness (NIL) power structure. Despite the clear enforceability and legal questions presented by this order, the NCAA has already indicated its intention to implement rules aligned with the order’s demands. The framework sets forth guidelines that favor institutional stability over athlete freedom. In reality, however, these guidelines reflect substantial deference to the NCAA and its historical compliance architecture, signaling a policy preference for centralized governance over athlete-driven market dynamics. In practical terms, the order narrows the scope of student-athlete discretion by circumscribing pathways that have recently expanded under NIL and a more open market, prioritizing uniformity and institutional control. It is too early to determine the exact ramifications of this executive order; however, its existence further emphasizes that change in the collegiate sports industry is coming.















